It elicited much
laughter. Some of this was caused by the hopeless anachronisms
in the presentation (such as buses from the 1950s and 60s endeavouring
to evoke London in the 1920s) but most of it arose from the ludicrous
misrepresentation of the Warlock story put across by the plot.
Cecil Gray's biography of Warlock, published in 1934, four years
after the composer's death, has been criticised by many (myself
included) for its selectivity and its amateurish attempt at psychoanalysis
but it presents a more credible attempt at encapsulating the essence
of a life than this dramatic travesty. Unfortunately, it is Gray's
curious theory of split personality (Heseltine as the sensitive,
mild-mannered aesthete, Warlock as the boisterous - boorish -
wild man) that the film (and some other performances) have taken
as a biographically accurate analysis.
It is true that
Warlock (I'll call him by that name for convenience) did work
in bursts of production and that, at times, he seemed smitten
by a despair that prevented creative activity. But that suggests
other conditions than split-personality and some writers, notably
the composer Denis ApIvor (who also has medical qualifications)
have sought to explain Warlock's situation in more authoritative
terms.
The use of a
pseudonym is not of itself indicative of a psychological problem.
Many other writers of one kind or another have used an alternative
name for professional reasons and this was also the case with
Warlock. The choice of that particular nom-de-plume has led to
some speculation but, so far, nobody has adequately explained
why it should be a source of speculation or, indeed, where it
could have come from. The use of alternative identities by others
has not elited adverse comment and "Warlock" is, in fact, only
one of a number of names that Philip Heseltine used - for a variety
of purposes and in a range of circumstances - throughout his career
as a journalist. The only other compositional pseudonym was "Prosdocimus
de Beldamandis Jr" which adorns his witty parodies of contemporary
light music, the "Cod-pieces". In that case it is reasonable to
view the name as a joke in its own right.